Politics & Government

F-Bombs OK? FCC Asks If It Should Ease Swearing, Nudity Ban

"It is our duty to nurture and protect them, why expose them to garbage?" commented one Apple Valley resident.

Should the Federal Communications Commission lighten up on enforcing its ban on swear words and nudity on broadcast media?

The agency has proposed doing just that—letting "fleeting" violations slide and enforcing its rules only for "eggregious" offenses.

The FCC invited comments for 60 days on the enforcement change in an April 1, 2013 announcement (click on PDF thumnail).

Find out what's happening in Apple Valley-Rosemountwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Jeanne Friendshuh of Apple Valley submitted this comment to the FCC on April 10:

Why would we allow expletives and nudity on public airwaves. Please for the sake of our chidren, let's use our brains. It is our duty to nurture and protect them, why expose them to garbage. Let them have their innocence for a few years.

Find out what's happening in Apple Valley-Rosemountwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Comments submitted to the FCC are public. You can see them by searching a comment database at the FCC website.

The Minnesota Family Council sent an email April 9 (click on PDF thumbnail) asking people to submit comments such as: "I oppose any changes to the current FCC indecency standards that would allow television and radio stations to broadcast expletives and nudity on the public airwaves, even if brief or 'fleeting.'”

Would you like the FCC to ease its enforcement of indecency rules on TV and radio broadcasters? Leave a comment below.

Click on the YouTube thumbnail (or visit YouTube.com) for an example of the "fleeting expletives" behind the U.S. Supreme Court case cited by the FCC. It's Cher at the 2002 Billboard Music Awards (6:00 mark—profanity warning).


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here